Home » Stars! Clones, Extensions, Modding » FreeStars » CA Balance
Re: CA Balance |
Tue, 08 March 2005 13:12 |
|
|
I agree that getting rid of instaforming would have a dramatic effect on CA. If tests were to show that just the instaforming removal didn't quite slow down CA enough then the next step is to modify the OA. First, the OA tech levels could be made higher - then, the module cost can be adjusted. I'm sure that the combination of these factors would be sufficent to balance CA.
Ptolemy
Though we often ask how and why, we must also do to get the answers to the questions.Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
CA Balance
By: mlaub on Fri, 09 April 2004 12:20
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: Ptolemy on Fri, 09 April 2004 12:34
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: Orca on Fri, 09 April 2004 13:17
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: Ptolemy on Fri, 09 April 2004 13:26
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: Orca on Fri, 09 April 2004 14:23
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: Carn on Sat, 10 April 2004 07:45
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: LEit on Sun, 11 April 2004 14:48
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: Orca on Mon, 12 April 2004 11:23
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: mlaub on Mon, 12 April 2004 11:12
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: LEit on Tue, 13 April 2004 15:11
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: Ptolemy on Tue, 13 April 2004 15:42
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: Orca on Tue, 13 April 2004 20:20
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: multilis on Tue, 13 April 2004 21:33
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: Ozone on Thu, 15 April 2004 01:12
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: Orca on Thu, 15 April 2004 11:10
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: mlaub on Thu, 15 April 2004 12:30
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: Ptolemy on Tue, 08 March 2005 13:12
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: Coyote on Fri, 16 April 2004 02:25
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
By: mazda on Fri, 16 April 2004 04:23
|
|
|
Re: CA Balance
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Jun 03 09:56:41 EDT 2024
|