Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » The Academy » Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...) |
Fri, 19 March 2004 09:10 |
|
|
It was turn 82, not 100 when game ended.
BET is not an advantage in the beginning - it can help later, and it is not a super LRT, just an LRT that plays different and matches a different style of play. It can do some overall good in the right hands.
Golden era for my HE is battleship era where BET and flux caps do most good. Gateless is a factor entire game.
Quote: |
So ... you killed that JoaT with having bigger economy, more minerals, better technology and wider alliance or you killed it with that BET?
|
Best answer I can give is healthy eccon, friends, and strategy (timing, etc). There were diplomatic battles for non-committed players, etc. Joys of being scary is other side says 'we need to stop the monster'. Joys of diplomacy is one works for the common good to keep friends happy which may not be my individual good (tech order, etc).
I had lots to learn and made certain mistakes being a newbie.
JOAT was eccon ahead at beginning, probably not by much. He was cranking out ships well, in the end he was suffering mineral depletus (while I was saving up for endgame, better mine efficiency).
I had wider alliance, there were some complexities of diplomacy to get that (and try and keep it). I was doing most of the warship building and battling while my friends who were more late game strengths were building up strength (for late game which never came).
I hear some insist on HE 4% or 5% as somehow being best. I played 6%, in right hands may actually be better IMO (less early game weakness). I have heard some insist on certain comparisions between 5% and 6% that I have proven not true.
[Updated on: Fri, 19 March 2004 09:11] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
|
|
|
Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...
|
|
|
Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...
|
|
|
Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...
By: iztok on Fri, 05 March 2004 08:28
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: Micha on Thu, 11 March 2004 03:26
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: Ptolemy on Tue, 16 March 2004 14:52
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: multilis on Tue, 16 March 2004 22:36
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: Staz on Wed, 17 March 2004 11:15
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: multilis on Wed, 17 March 2004 12:59
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: iztok on Wed, 17 March 2004 15:30
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: multilis on Wed, 17 March 2004 15:45
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: Orca on Wed, 17 March 2004 16:28
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: multilis on Wed, 17 March 2004 16:05
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: Orca on Wed, 17 March 2004 16:41
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: multilis on Wed, 17 March 2004 18:46
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: Orca on Wed, 17 March 2004 19:22
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: multilis on Wed, 17 March 2004 20:15
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: multilis on Wed, 17 March 2004 20:33
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: LEit on Wed, 17 March 2004 21:20
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: multilis on Wed, 17 March 2004 21:36
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: iztok on Thu, 18 March 2004 04:44
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: multilis on Thu, 18 March 2004 10:54
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: Kotk on Thu, 18 March 2004 12:20
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: multilis on Thu, 18 March 2004 18:28
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: Kotk on Fri, 19 March 2004 08:00
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: multilis on Fri, 19 March 2004 09:10
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: mlaub on Fri, 19 March 2004 13:31
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: multilis on Fri, 19 March 2004 15:03
|
|
|
Re: Cruisers vs Battleships (Re: Maybe i am a little thick but...)
By: multilis on Thu, 18 March 2004 13:34
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Jun 30 05:41:07 EDT 2024
|