Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Primary Racial Traits » SS » SS ultimate strategy?
Re: SS ultimate strategy? Sat, 14 December 2002 12:40 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
BlueTurbit

 
Lt. Commander

RIP
BlueTurbit died Oct. 20, 2011

Messages: 835
Registered: October 2002
Location: Heart of Texas
Quote:

I've said it before on the forum and i'll say it again. Primary goal in stars is to have fun, second is winning

That is your opinion, others disagree. Primary goal in all games is to have fun winning, plan B, have fun losing. Smile
Quote:

If you aren't having fun you generally don't play.
But lots of people who never win any games play lots.
Therefore you play for fun, but you'd like to win.

Some people play strategy games for the challenge. If they have fun doing this, this is great. It may be it is just an intellectual challenge to them. Some people try even harder to win if they lose all the time, as the challenge becomes greater. Smile
Quote:

If you set out solely to win and this opportunity arises why not grasp it if winning is so important?

Some people prefer to maintain integrity. Backstabbing is not an ethical way to succeed. The greater challenge is to win with integrity. Smile
Quote:

Apelord was right - backstabbing is part and parcel.

Apelord is lord of the apes. Myself, I generally do not listen to apes as they have "evolved" too slowly to keep up with the rest of the species. Smile My Lord says to me, integrity counts for much. And he says he made the apes. Laughing
Part and parcel means - an essential or integral component. Backstabbing is not "essential" anymore than "cheating" or "quitting early" is. Backstabbing is a practice that is used by very few players and usually has negative results, as Apelord pointed out in another post.
Quote:

But what IF the alliance you agreed to was the begginning of putting this plan into motion? i.e. Player C is under attack from player B. You offer player C help by performing this action on player B. Player B welcomes the supposed "help" and as such gets screwed because he played right into the hands of player A and C? Is that wrong? Player A and C made the alliance before a and b did.

I would say player A is wrong. As player A made two alliances. In making an alliance with B he should have pointed out to B that he had
...




BlueTurbit Country/Rock

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message icon10.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon6.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: What kind of Rogue?
Next Topic: hybrid SS race; also, build order for first ~10 turns?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Jul 01 01:01:51 EDT 2024