|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Octahedron |
Mon, 07 July 2008 07:08 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](theme/Stars/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](theme/Stars/images/down.png) |
|
|
Micha wrote on Mon, 07 July 2008 05:36 | Will there be looked at habs when placing the races?
mch
|
I might have all on to find a universe that fits well enough to arrange the 8 HWs (& possible HW2s). IMO, the most important thing is to get the HWs reasonably equidistant & moving them on the horizontal plane will usually be impractical since any planets between the original HW position & the desired position must also be moved.
I'll check habs for horrible draws but you might still do substantially better or worse than expectations.
Micha's race file is in.
Soobie
Are you replacing knightpraetor?
ForceUser
Still looking for your race file.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Octahedron UPDATE |
Tue, 08 July 2008 06:27 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](theme/Stars/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](theme/Stars/images/down.png) |
|
|
AlexTheGreat wrote on Tue, 08 July 2008 12:59 |
Chaos, when I've completed the generation, I'll send the files straight to Ron to speed things up & send a copy to you. Is that OK?
|
That's will be great! Thank you for you assistance!
B.T.W.
I have read the thread and i have think about game concept. I think we must determine the "dead" conditions... Total annihilation will not be acceptable here, so i'm proposing such rules for your choice.
Player is considered dead, if:
- he have less then 500 score points after year 2450.
- he have less then 5 planets after year 2450.
(all numbers are under discussion)
Please utter an opinion about this stuff. What do you think?
we will never dieReport message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Octahedron |
Wed, 09 July 2008 01:21 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](theme/Stars/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](theme/Stars/images/down.png) |
|
|
I would agree with the less than 5 planets after 2450, tacking on the condition that the HW is no longer populated. If they still have their homeworld, I think that should overrule any proclamation of destruction.
Anyone else want to jump in with suggestions?
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
Octahedron - SHIPS MOVING FROM DEEP SPACE |
Wed, 09 July 2008 08:46 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](theme/Stars/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](theme/Stars/images/down.png) |
|
|
One player has reported a possible corruption because ships appear to come from deep space rather than from the HW.
This is NOT a corruption. The effect described is due to the fact that the HW (& HW2 if you have one) were moved in order to form the hexagonal shape required for the game.
This is inconvenient but does not cause a problem. When the ships move they WILL move from your HW - in order to get your distance & fuel consumption set waypoint 1 as your HW, waypoint 2 as the place you actually want to go & then calculate fuel as (fuel used at waypoint 2 - fuel used at waypoint 1), then remove waypoint 1 (to your HW). If you have ships that you don't want to move just set waypoint 1 as your HW.
If you have a HW2 same goes for any ships that started there.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Octahedron - SHIPS MOVING FROM DEEP SPACE |
Wed, 09 July 2008 12:26 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](theme/Stars/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](theme/Stars/images/down.png) |
|
vmanuel | ![](images/cwo3.gif) | Chief Warrant Officer 3 | Messages: 187
Registered: October 2004 Location: Dallas, TX USA | |
|
joseph wrote on Wed, 09 July 2008 10:30 | Back from the "Dead"
What happens if a player is at some point reduced to less than 5 planets (so considered Dead) but continues playing
|
Since we have Public Scores, I could see that people getting set to inactive once they reach less than 5 planets is a viable option.
Otherwise we could just say that you get points for the "kill" and that's that. If they come back to any degree, you keep your points.
With Option 2, it is possible for your enemy to end up helping their ally kill you back, which is ALWAYS fun ![Smile](images/smiley_icons/icon_smile.gif)
Also, Option 2 would take into account the ability for people to keep trying to earn points even after their "dead"...
[Updated on: Wed, 09 July 2008 12:28]
Editor in Chief of the Kaynan Space News.
All Space, All The Time - Kaynan!
www.myhood.bizReport message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Octahedron |
Wed, 09 July 2008 14:20 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](theme/Stars/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](theme/Stars/images/down.png) |
|
|
I would prefer that 'dead' mean you can't get or be worth points for anything; thus, even if you're blastedly stubborn (I'm that way as well), the game has a definite chance of ending. Perhaps there could be a tack-on that if a majority of non-dead players agree that a race is no longer dead, they can come back, so that there IS a chance of return.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Octahedron NO PPS |
Wed, 09 July 2008 18:41 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](theme/Stars/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](theme/Stars/images/down.png) |
|
|
vmanuel wrote on Wed, 09 July 2008 12:26 | Since we have Public Scores,
|
No we don't. Everyone who offered an opinion re. PPS was against it so it was dropped.
[Updated on: Wed, 09 July 2008 18:43] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|