skoormit wrote on Wed, 03 December 2014 20:00

I'm in favor of allowing uncommunicated cooperation in no-comms games, on the grounds that:
1) The game is more fun that way
2) It doesn't negate the primary goal of no-comms (to remove the overbearing effects of diplomacy)
3) It's hard to define exactly what counts as "cooperation"

Reasonable people can disagree, certainly.

The other as important reason for no-comms-games is usual that players expect to be in a no-alliance-situation where everybody needs to fight for himself. No big boring alliances of 5 players smashing a single player.