Why bi-immunity is a bad idea. |
Tue, 05 July 2011 06:58 |
|
magic9mushroom | | Commander | Messages: 1361
Registered: May 2008 | |
|
Even for AR and HE, who can take fairly low growth and at least consider the idea.
Compare these two hab schemes:
Grav immune/Temp (-120)-120/Rad 16-84
vs.
Grav immune/Temp immune/Rad 64-84.
The first starts with 47% of planets green, 12% over 75% habitability.
The second starts with 21% of planets green, 13% over 75% habitability.
The first reaches 98% green, 49% >75%.
The second reaches 52% green, 43% >75%.
The second costs more RW points, BTW.
Conclusion: 1-immune 2-wide is pretty much strictly better than 2-immune 1-narrow, largely because the second immunity costs so much more than the first.
(Yes, I know that most experienced players will know this, but some newbies won't.)
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|