Home World Forum: AR

Home » Primary Racial Traits » AR » AR design

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: AR design

Tue, 01 August 2006 16:50

Marduk

Ensign

Messages: 345
Registered: January 2003
Location: Dayton, OH

Staz wrote on Tue, 01 August 2006 14:22

iztok wrote on Wed, 12 July 2006 08:05

400k pop on 90% planet gives at en-10 569 res. 300k pop on 90% and 100k on 40% gives 621 res. Sad

At 15% PGR and assuming no crowding (Ultras), 400+0 will give you 54k growth. 300+100 will give you 46.5K growth.

So you are trading 9% more resources (621v569) against 16% better growth (54v46.5).

Is that a good trade?

Also, if you look at worst case (a 100% world and a 25% world) the most resources seem to come from a 94% / 6% split. And even that is only 3% more resources than having all the pop on the 100% planet.

Purely for purposes of generating more resources sooner, it is a good trade. The number of 'bonus' resources declines slightly year by year until the breeder starts crowding, and then begins to increase again. In the example given (the 40% second world), you'll always have gained more resources because of splitting your population sooner.

However, presumably you will keep your breeder at a level where you aren't suffering from crowding. Either 25% for the maximum relative pop growth or the 33% level for maximum absolute pop growth in that system. Your 'bonus' resources will cap at that point and decline from there because of reduced population growth at and following the initial split. Eventually this may (depending on hab values for any given system) result in a reduction in resources produced relative to having maximized your population growth instead of splitting early.

But it isn't likely that the newly capped breeder will be exporting all of it's population to other 90% worlds. The lower the average value of the developing worlds (after the first 100k seed), the better (or at least less worse) the decision to split early looks.

Then you need to consider the costs of the initial split. Splitting at lower values implies splitting more often, occupying more systems. Good so far, but the more systems you are occupying, the more resources and minerals you are spending (transports, defending war ...

[ Show the rest of the message ]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		AR design By: boneandrew on Mon, 09 June 2003 00:07
		Re: AR design By: freakyboy on Mon, 09 June 2003 03:09
		Re: AR design By: iztok on Tue, 10 June 2003 07:04
		Re: AR design By: Dogthinkers on Wed, 03 September 2003 22:10
		Re: AR design By: Sotek on Wed, 03 September 2003 23:33
		Re: AR design By: freakyboy on Thu, 04 September 2003 02:39
		Re: AR design By: Dogthinkers on Thu, 04 September 2003 19:17
		Re: AR design By: iztok on Fri, 05 September 2003 02:41
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Mon, 03 July 2006 10:43
		Re: AR design By: Dogthinkers on Mon, 03 July 2006 22:32
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Tue, 04 July 2006 06:05
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Tue, 04 July 2006 13:27
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Tue, 04 July 2006 14:13
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Tue, 04 July 2006 15:53
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Wed, 05 July 2006 04:34
		Re: AR design By: Dogthinkers on Wed, 05 July 2006 21:49
		Re: AR design By: iztok on Thu, 06 July 2006 02:34
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Thu, 06 July 2006 04:22
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Thu, 06 July 2006 08:08
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Thu, 06 July 2006 10:47
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Thu, 06 July 2006 12:49
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Thu, 06 July 2006 13:23
		Re: AR design By: iztok on Thu, 06 July 2006 17:30
		Re: AR design By: Dogthinkers on Thu, 06 July 2006 21:45
		Re: AR design By: Dogthinkers on Fri, 07 July 2006 05:08
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Fri, 07 July 2006 10:14
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Mon, 10 July 2006 07:26
		Re: AR design By: iztok on Mon, 10 July 2006 14:35
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Fri, 07 July 2006 09:28
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Mon, 10 July 2006 07:02
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Mon, 10 July 2006 09:42
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Mon, 10 July 2006 10:25
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Mon, 10 July 2006 14:03
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Mon, 10 July 2006 14:17
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Mon, 10 July 2006 15:35
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Tue, 11 July 2006 04:27
		Re: AR design By: Dogthinkers on Tue, 11 July 2006 05:36
		Re: AR design By: iztok on Tue, 11 July 2006 06:48
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Tue, 11 July 2006 16:50
		Re: AR design By: Dogthinkers on Tue, 11 July 2006 22:00
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Tue, 11 July 2006 18:33
		Re: AR design By: iztok on Wed, 12 July 2006 03:05
		Re: AR design By: Staz on Tue, 01 August 2006 14:22
		Re: AR design By: Marduk on Tue, 01 August 2006 16:50
		Re: AR design By: Staz on Tue, 01 August 2006 19:08
		Re: AR design By: Staz on Wed, 02 August 2006 07:49
		Re: AR design By: Dogthinkers on Wed, 02 August 2006 21:47
		Re: AR design By: iztok on Tue, 01 August 2006 11:59
		Re: AR design By: multilis on Tue, 01 August 2006 17:56
		Re: AR design By: iztok on Wed, 02 August 2006 04:39
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Wed, 02 August 2006 07:50
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Wed, 02 August 2006 14:09
		Re: AR design By: iztok on Thu, 03 August 2006 03:59
		Re: AR design By: joseph on Thu, 03 August 2006 07:09
		Re: AR design By: multilis on Thu, 03 August 2006 10:36
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Fri, 04 August 2006 10:26
		Re: AR design By: multilis on Sat, 05 August 2006 11:46
		Re: AR design By: crr65536 on Wed, 09 August 2006 11:55
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Sat, 12 August 2006 20:05
		Re: AR design By: multilis on Sun, 13 August 2006 01:04
		Re: AR design By: crr65536 on Mon, 14 August 2006 01:58
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Mon, 14 August 2006 12:19
		Re: AR design By: crr65536 on Mon, 14 August 2006 14:11
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Mon, 14 August 2006 15:45
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Tue, 15 August 2006 04:48
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Tue, 15 August 2006 08:51
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Tue, 15 August 2006 09:30
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Tue, 15 August 2006 11:59
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Tue, 15 August 2006 13:29
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Tue, 15 August 2006 19:51
		Re: AR design By: Tomasoid on Wed, 16 August 2006 07:46
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Wed, 16 August 2006 12:15
		Re: AR design By: multilis on Wed, 16 August 2006 15:58
		Re: AR design By: multilis on Wed, 02 August 2006 17:17
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Thu, 03 August 2006 00:23
		Re: AR design By: multilis on Thu, 03 August 2006 02:37
		Re: AR design By: iztok on Thu, 04 September 2003 07:27
		Re: AR design By: freakyboy on Thu, 04 September 2003 18:32
		Re: AR design By: iztok on Fri, 05 September 2003 02:12
		Re: AR design By: freakyboy on Fri, 05 September 2003 02:41
		Re: AR design By: freakyboy on Fri, 05 September 2003 02:46
		Re: AR design By: iztok on Fri, 05 September 2003 03:13
		Re: AR design By: freakyboy on Fri, 05 September 2003 08:19
		Re: AR design By: The Taubat on Fri, 05 September 2003 14:59
		Re: AR design By: freakyboy on Fri, 05 September 2003 22:16
		Re: AR design By: Steve on Wed, 10 September 2003 09:38
		Re: AR design By: iztok on Wed, 10 September 2003 09:55
		Re: AR design By: XyliGUN on Mon, 26 June 2006 20:31
		Re: AR design By: Dogthinkers on Mon, 26 June 2006 21:48
		Re: AR design By: XyliGUN on Tue, 27 June 2006 20:49
		Re: AR design By: Kotk on Tue, 27 June 2006 21:29
		Re: AR design By: Dogthinkers on Tue, 27 June 2006 22:18
		Re: AR design By: XyliGUN on Wed, 28 June 2006 03:41
		Re: AR design By: XyliGUN on Wed, 28 June 2006 03:59

Previous Topic:	Iperithon's AR
Next Topic:	colonizing reds

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Thu Apr 25 01:15:28 EDT 2024