Home » Primary Racial Traits » AR » TT AR
| Re: TT AR |
Wed, 04 June 2008 05:17   |
|
|
|
| magic9mushroom wrote on Wed, 04 June 2008 02:16 |
Hence, the only ones I think were a bad idea were NAS, NRSE and RS,
Also, how did you possibly get a 1 in 5 hab with that setup? I don't get how it's possible... Without sending your hab ranges to the edges and nullifying the benefits of TT, that is.
|
RS does indeed cost 20 points if it's your 7th LSP but I can assure you that the extra shielding on ships has saved my hide on more than one occasion in this game. Over the full length of a game shields are much more important than armour. Admittedly the shields will easily be sapped on a base but the armour won't be worth much once the shields are gone either. Armour make ships sluggish & remove/reduce the chances of moving last in battles. OTOH RS shields get 40% better shielding & regenerate 10% each battle round & your ships are fast & light increasing the chances of moving last. In this game I've successfully used weap16 BBs against weap20 BBs in the case of one enemy & weap20 BBs against weap22 BBs in case of another (tho, against the odds, I sometimes lost in that matchup) - both were possible only by keeping the ships light.
NAS: 78 points is huge. The only way I could save the points is thru reducing hab widths from 1/5 to 1/7. No thanks, I'd rather post sentries at unoccupied planets until I colonise them.
NRSE: cost is only 24 points so, if I were to have dropped a LRT, it would have been that one. Your point is also a good one re. engine cost + scoop engines are lighter than standard fuel guzzlers. Still habs drop back to 1/6 &, with Prop expensive, the better engines will be unavailable until late game.
How I got 1/5? The game is still on so I won't give you details here even tho it probably doesn't matter too much. Surfice to say that all planets are eventually green.
...
[Updated on: Wed, 04 June 2008 05:22] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
 |
|
TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Soobie on Tue, 27 May 2008 07:31 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: joseph on Tue, 27 May 2008 18:11 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Micha on Wed, 28 May 2008 04:24 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: iztok on Wed, 28 May 2008 08:27 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: iztok on Thu, 29 May 2008 02:57 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: iztok on Fri, 30 May 2008 09:45 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Soobie on Fri, 30 May 2008 11:15 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Soobie on Sun, 01 June 2008 11:11 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Soobie on Mon, 02 June 2008 07:13 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Soobie on Tue, 03 June 2008 05:50 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: LEit on Tue, 03 June 2008 10:43 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Adacore on Tue, 03 June 2008 10:55 |
|
|
Forum ranking (Re: TT AR)
By: Micha on Tue, 03 June 2008 11:00 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Adacore on Tue, 03 June 2008 13:03 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Soobie on Wed, 04 June 2008 11:23 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Micha on Thu, 07 August 2008 07:12 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Adacore on Wed, 04 June 2008 01:38 |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Apr 24 20:49:40 EDT 2024
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
