Home » Primary Racial Traits » AR » TT AR
| Re: TT AR |
Wed, 04 June 2008 02:16   |
|
 magic9mushroom |
 | Commander |
Messages: 1361
Registered: May 2008 | |
|
| AlexTheGreat wrote on Wed, 04 June 2008 15:45 |
| magic9mushroom wrote on Wed, 04 June 2008 01:14 |
Why did you take seven LRTs? the point penalty is horrible. And there's an argument for CE if you have NRSE.
|
Each & every one of them was integral to the strategy:
1 & 2. I felt that IFE/NRSE was needed if I was going with TT since the penalty for > 3.5 cheap techs is even more crippling. The alternative was noIFE/noNRSE with expensive Prop or TT with expensive Bio & I fancied neither.
|
Why NRSE? Hurts ARs more than normals due to 2.5 times engine resource cost. Hence why I thought CE would be a good idea.
| Quote: |
3. ISB is a given for an AR IMO, particularly for that universe.
|
No objections there, the only reason I wouldn't take it is if I was 3i.
| Quote: |
4. NAS was needed to save RPs. Even with 6 other LRTs you save 78 points.
|
Not that much for the cost though. Still, it's not my main problem.
| Quote: |
6. ARM is also invaluable for an AR. Not taking it means that the mineral flow will start later, the remote mining ships cost more & they're too heavy to gate.
|
Again, no objections.
| Quote: |
6. TT. The key LRT for this race design (no immunity, widish habs for an AR).
|
No problems.
| Quote: |
7. RS. I didn't take RS in my first 3 games &, tho I did pretty well, I decided that RS should (nearly) always be in my LRT list.
|
You know that that costs 20 points though don't you? And makes your DSs quite a bit weaker?
Hence, the only ones I think were a bad idea were NAS, NRSE and RS,
| Quote: |
With regard to CE. I would NEVER take it. I really hate to lose a key battle because my engines didn't engage. I could not envisage a game that could convince me that it was worth it unless it was a scenario requirement.
|
Also, how did you possibly get a 1 in 5 hab with that setup? I don't get how it's possible... Without sending your hab ranges to the edges and nullifying the benefits of TT, that is.
...
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
 |
|
TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Soobie on Tue, 27 May 2008 07:31 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: joseph on Tue, 27 May 2008 18:11 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Micha on Wed, 28 May 2008 04:24 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: iztok on Wed, 28 May 2008 08:27 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: iztok on Thu, 29 May 2008 02:57 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: iztok on Fri, 30 May 2008 09:45 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Soobie on Fri, 30 May 2008 11:15 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Soobie on Sun, 01 June 2008 11:11 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Soobie on Mon, 02 June 2008 07:13 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Soobie on Tue, 03 June 2008 05:50 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: LEit on Tue, 03 June 2008 10:43 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Adacore on Tue, 03 June 2008 10:55 |
|
|
Forum ranking (Re: TT AR)
By: Micha on Tue, 03 June 2008 11:00 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Adacore on Tue, 03 June 2008 13:03 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Soobie on Wed, 04 June 2008 11:23 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
|
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Micha on Thu, 07 August 2008 07:12 |
|
|
Re: TT AR
By: Adacore on Wed, 04 June 2008 01:38 |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Apr 25 13:06:01 EDT 2024
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
