Home » Primary Racial Traits » AR » so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
| Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10 |
Sun, 25 February 2007 17:52   |
|
|
|
I still think points to min conc are not usefull enough for 3i AR... Thanks to sqrt formulas the 3i AR will generate more minerals than a 2i/1i AR race in early game, thanks to being spread over so many colonies. Coloniser-boosters server very nicely in multiple roles - as early boosters for those colonisers, for getting extra pop exported out early (and minimising pop loss) and also for returning minerals from the colonies to the producer(s). I find they return more minerals than they cost.
I think if you want to put points to anything, they will sit happiest against surface minerals, but even those I would just use 'spare' points rather than trying to find points anywhere.
Try it  It works just fine for me As I mentioned before, even a bad iron draw matters very little to this race as your mine earnings are distributed over so many worlds so quickly, so the concs on the HW itself become very rapidly insignificant. The two starting miners for ARM are certainly quite nice though, and having the midget hull is nice for when you do eventually need miners (I wanted extra minerals for larger warfleets around 2425 in the tests I did.)
But, as Iztok says, 6% 3i AR is somewhat broken by the 6% part... 12500 is pretty close to being a hard limit imposed by PGR even unopposed. I don't think 12500@2450 under perfect conditions is performance worthy of keeping a race under consideration for a real game.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
 |
|
so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: wizard on Sun, 15 October 2006 01:52 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: iztok on Mon, 16 October 2006 02:18 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Kotk on Mon, 16 October 2006 23:30 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Carn on Wed, 21 February 2007 08:25 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Carn on Thu, 22 February 2007 05:14 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Carn on Fri, 23 February 2007 05:03 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Marduk on Fri, 23 February 2007 16:13 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Carn on Sat, 24 February 2007 09:25 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: iztok on Thu, 22 February 2007 02:06 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Carn on Thu, 22 February 2007 05:20 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: iztok on Fri, 23 February 2007 01:55 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Carn on Fri, 23 February 2007 04:50 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: iztok on Sat, 24 February 2007 05:16 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Carn on Sat, 24 February 2007 09:29 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: iztok on Sat, 24 February 2007 17:18 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: iztok on Mon, 26 February 2007 01:42 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Soobie on Sat, 19 July 2008 22:45 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Soobie on Sun, 20 July 2008 11:07 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Soobie on Mon, 21 July 2008 17:39 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Apr 25 12:09:05 EDT 2024
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
