Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » Questions about Stars! AutoHost » Military cutback
Re: Military cutback |
Thu, 21 November 2002 18:22 |
|
UAF commander | | Petty Officer 2nd Class | Messages: 54
Registered: November 2002 | |
|
Is someone with 134 posts and civillian rank, and one with 43 and is High level Crewman?
To my understanding, the person with more posts would (currently) have the higher rank.
Also, I am not talking about pics in the signiture area, I'm talking about having the avatars where the rank is currently shown. (You looked at that forum I mentioned?)
Also, by getting rid of the rank by # of posts system, we made usre that no one would go from thread to thraed and post *bump* just to get rank.
To sum it all: it's not the rank system I'm againt, it's the nice (small!) avatars I'm in favor. And right now the rank system just seem useless to me. If I want to know how many posts someone made, I'll look at the # of posts field, not the rank.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Military cutback
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: Ron on Sun, 10 November 2002 11:33
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: JamesWD on Mon, 11 November 2002 09:29
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: Ron on Mon, 11 November 2002 09:41
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: EDog on Tue, 12 November 2002 02:45
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: JamesWD on Tue, 12 November 2002 05:41
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: Ron on Tue, 12 November 2002 09:35
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: JamesWD on Tue, 12 November 2002 11:05
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: ccmaster on Wed, 13 November 2002 20:13
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: Ron on Fri, 15 November 2002 17:58
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: Stalwart on Thu, 21 November 2002 14:25
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: ccmaster on Fri, 15 November 2002 23:50
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: Caracan on Sun, 17 November 2002 13:03
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: ccmaster on Mon, 18 November 2002 20:53
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: JamesWD on Tue, 19 November 2002 05:17
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: Ron on Tue, 19 November 2002 13:07
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: Ron on Thu, 21 November 2002 22:45
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: gary d on Sun, 24 November 2002 12:50
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: tech25 on Thu, 21 November 2002 19:23
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: McKulz on Sat, 07 December 2002 19:38
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: Ron on Sat, 07 December 2002 23:46
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: gible on Sun, 08 December 2002 03:27
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: Ron on Sun, 08 December 2002 12:48
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: jeffimix on Sun, 08 December 2002 20:02
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: Ron on Sun, 08 December 2002 20:37
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: jeffimix on Mon, 09 December 2002 06:49
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: Peptis on Mon, 09 December 2002 17:58
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: gible on Mon, 09 December 2002 20:04
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: Ron on Mon, 09 December 2002 22:34
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
By: Ron on Mon, 09 December 2002 22:56
|
|
|
Re: Military cutback
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Apr 19 01:36:42 EDT 2024
|