Home » Old Game Forums » Pebble in the Sky » And the Results are:
| Re: And the Results are: |
Wed, 09 June 2004 11:27   |
|
 Kaly |
 | Crewman 3rd Class |
Messages: 9
Registered: January 2004
Location: Portugal | |
|
Hello
First of all I would like to congratulate the Asgard for theirs magnificent resources and number of planets.
Also would like to congratulate the Winning Alliance for their co-operation showed.
Also would like to say that I’m a beginner internet player so don’t now much about player relations and diplomacy, AI don’t talk back and won’t make border lines with you and surely don’t trade any Tech.
In reply to the Asgard question, why do I attack them
The first hawser is panic, as I saw that the Asgard already have build a space dock with stargate at Lukundoo and pursuit the Lemmings from there realised that should keep my supremacy in the region so I used my obsolete bombers to wipe out Lukundoo, Decatur will be next...
I did have a treaty with the Asgard, so I though but the insistent colony that have taken Pilgrim’s Harbour made think otherwise.
I consider as my space the entire region my race controls not only the planets it occupies, so I have taken Pilgrim’s Harbour as soon as possible.
The Asgard must understand that my priority was the Clinton planet a H.W. that was taken with all the factories and mines still standing, witch combined with the large amount of minerals found there and in the nearby Galbraith planet (more that 20000KT of each kind in total) provide a building facility of the most important. As I controlled the entire SW region from Entreprise would not tolerate any colony in my rear lines.
I had no quarrel with the Asgard and would stop in the Ceres cluster my aggression but won’t allow any ship to go SW of Entreprise.
As for the Lemming in that area they would not pose a treat no matter how many frigates they possess so I would not interfere in their war with the Asgard, not yet.
A note to the Black Angels reference to my battle ships(26 ships), in fact they weren’t so obsolete as my destroyers (W10) they have 300 weight(no armour) but are equipped with shields 10 and beam weapon 16, count as capital ships and would proved to be deadly once your missiles would shot at my chaff (destroyers already in place)
I don’t consider my planets to be “poorly defended” in fact haven’t build any Dreadnought because they would be as obsolete as my Battle ships so I preferred to maintain a defensive mobile fleet until reached better tech.
For your information my tech at the time was Ener 11; Weap 20; Prop 10; Const 17; Elect 10; Bio 6.
If necessary I would build missile ships but was trying to reach E 14 in order to build better shielded Beam weapon ships and really on chaff.
In justice my Pionner didn’t posed any threat to the Alliance but I was building up my few planets relying in a safe border with the Spevck2 witch I considered to be my Friends, I would only take action if the occasion should arise in the battle with the Wobloids and even there would try not to occupy any planet but to prey on the remaining fleets hoping to gain some tech.
My resources at year #60 are 22450, I would prefer to keep my race secret because is of my design and wish to use it until I improved it.
I would like to thank every player that stuck to the end but also would like to say that I consider to be much unfair the outcome of a game in which players drop out. Most of the territory I gathered was from two drop out players so that shows how unbalance the game becomes as your opponents drop out.
Never the less I had a great time and a learning experience playing against human opponents.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
And the Results are:
By: nash on Sat, 05 June 2004 00:53 |
|
 |
Re: And the Results are:
|
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
By: nash on Sat, 05 June 2004 07:12 |
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
|
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
By: Evaron on Sat, 05 June 2004 23:27 |
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
By: Evaron on Sat, 05 June 2004 23:13 |
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
|
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
|
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
|
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
|
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
By: Evaron on Sun, 06 June 2004 17:36 |
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
By: Evaron on Sun, 06 June 2004 17:38 |
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
|
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
|
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
By: Evaron on Mon, 07 June 2004 02:49 |
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
By: Kaly on Wed, 09 June 2004 11:27 |
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
|
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
|
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
By: Evaron on Wed, 16 June 2004 00:20 |
|
|
Re: And the Results are:
By: nash on Wed, 23 June 2004 07:59 |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Apr 18 11:03:32 EDT 2024
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
