|
|
|
Re: Stone Age Slaughter 7 |
Mon, 27 August 2012 22:54 |
|
|
Mark Hewitt wrote on Mon, 27 August 2012 19:04I've thought things over again about running with 7. If Mac does drop, I'd like to try to get a replacement. 'Cause I think the odd race out wouldn't like it so much when alliances pair up.
What makes you think that's going to happen? Alliances are never set in stone, except when they are. You ally with whoever's the most useful to have as an ally. By the time Game Victory comes around and the two-player-alliance bit becomes relevant, there'll probably be several dead races anyway, so it's a moot point.
[Updated on: Mon, 27 August 2012 22:56] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Stone Age Slaughter 7 |
Tue, 28 August 2012 19:02 |
|
|
ManicLurch wrote on Tue, 28 August 2012 12:15Quote:There is apparently a major bug in universe creation when using 2.7j instead of 2.6j and he was counting on that, not knowing it was a bug,
Can you explain this more? I haven't heard of it and I am curious.
I've never heard of it either, so my interest is rather piqued!
Right now, I'm debating whether I want to change my race... eh, I'll stay with what I have.
[Updated on: Tue, 28 August 2012 19:18] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Stone Age Slaughter 7 |
Tue, 28 August 2012 21:47 |
|
Marduk | | Ensign | Messages: 345
Registered: January 2003 Location: Dayton, OH | |
|
Coyote wrote on Tue, 28 August 2012 19:02Quote:There is apparently a major bug in universe creation when using 2.7j instead of 2.6j and he was counting on that, not knowing it was a bug,
I've never heard of it either, so my interest is rather piqued!
Yes, normally I would be somewhat upset at Mac for his shennanegans (however that is spelled). But I can see how he could have gotten the idea this behavior was normal, and it is a very interesting bug. I don't want to reveal it until later so that no one gets early hints about his race design; that will also give me time to run some tests and find out more about the bug before I throw it to the detectives.
Anyway, the re-created universe files have been sent to Ron. I don't know if we will get quite as speedy a response this time, but I praise The Ron for his patience, forbearance and kindness regardless. And I finally got a postcard to send him... one of those things I kept putting off "until I have the time" for a few years. It may take me a few months yet to get to the post office to mail it, but progress has been made!
One out of five dentists recommends occasional random executions to keep the peasants cowed and servile.Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Stone Age Slaughter 7 |
Tue, 28 August 2012 22:01 |
|
|
My suspicion is that it has something to do with the IT/PP secondary planet, but that's a pretty wild guess.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Stone Age Slaughter 7 |
Fri, 31 August 2012 12:31 |
|
|
LittleEddie wrote on Fri, 31 August 2012 09:25Stupid question #1
Starter ships with missiles?
I say use them untell they are destroyed but you can't make any more
Cheh, if you have a pile of expensive starting ships you're supposed to take Ultimate Recycling and scrap them for a starting factory boost. It works like magic!
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Stone Age Slaughter 7 |
Sat, 01 September 2012 04:52 |
|
|
In older versions of the game you used to get 16 blue lasers and 16 alphas on your starting SB. I'm not sure why this changed.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Stone Age Slaughter 7 |
Sat, 01 September 2012 08:08 |
|
|
Can we turn off Strict Schedule? Right now everyone's turn is in and it's still 35 hours until forcegen.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|