Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Old Game Forums » All Quiet » Mycelium/Ellurid Feud
Mycelium/Ellurid Feud Sun, 29 March 2009 15:39 Go to next message
magic9mushroom is currently offline magic9mushroom

 
Commander

Messages: 1154
Registered: May 2008
Combat wrote on Sun, 29 March 2009 23:11

Eagle of Fire wrote on Sat, 28 March 2009 20:33


Edit: also, I thought it was already said in the game thread that everybody should change their default orders to prevent such problems? If it is the case then it would be no excuse.


I belive you are correct and I agree that it would not be a legitimate excuse I just have a bad habit of playing devil's advocate.


Unsurprising given certain recent events...

Report message to a moderator

Re: NAP Breach Sun, 29 March 2009 16:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Combat is currently offline Combat

 
Warrant Officer

Messages: 118
Registered: May 2008
Unsurprising given certain recent events... Rolling Eyes

[Updated on: Sun, 29 March 2009 16:52]




He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster...when you gaze long into the abyss the abyss also gazes into you.

Report message to a moderator

Re: NAP Breach Sun, 29 March 2009 20:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
magic9mushroom is currently offline magic9mushroom

 
Commander

Messages: 1154
Registered: May 2008
Combat wrote on Mon, 30 March 2009 06:51

Unsurprising given certain recent events... Rolling Eyes


I'm the one rolling my eyes at you.

I mean seriously, as if you were going to use the built up fleet for anything else, and your reaction once we spotted it betrayed your intent. And as if I was being aggressive with no combat ships.

I have no problem with being at war with you but I do have a problem with you lying about the circumstances causing it.

Report message to a moderator

Re: NAP Breach Mon, 30 March 2009 08:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Combat is currently offline Combat

 
Warrant Officer

Messages: 118
Registered: May 2008
magic9mushroom wrote on Sun, 29 March 2009 20:42

Combat wrote on Mon, 30 March 2009 06:51

Unsurprising given certain recent events... Rolling Eyes


I'm the one rolling my eyes at you.

I mean seriously, as if you were going to use the built up fleet for anything else, and your reaction once we spotted it betrayed your intent. And as if I was being aggressive with no combat ships.

I have no problem with being at war with you but I do have a problem with you lying about the circumstances causing it.


Except for the fact that you betray the reason I felt war was needed by putting up posts like this. Your in game messages have the same aggressive standoffish nature to them. To be honest I had little knowledge of your military capabilities in one direction or another. My decision was based mostly on the nature of these messages. If you want to "talk tough" you should at least put some thought into how such a posture could affect not only yourself but your allies as well. I have been writing a game log that I plan to put into game stories once this game is over. Only then will you have the right to judge my intentions as they were at any one time.



He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster...when you gaze long into the abyss the abyss also gazes into you.

Report message to a moderator

Re: NAP Breach Mon, 30 March 2009 10:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
magic9mushroom is currently offline magic9mushroom

 
Commander

Messages: 1154
Registered: May 2008
Combat wrote on Mon, 30 March 2009 22:31

Except for the fact that you betray the reason I felt war was needed by putting up posts like this. Your in game messages have the same aggressive standoffish nature to them. To be honest I had little knowledge of your military capabilities in one direction or another. My decision was based mostly on the nature of these messages. If you want to "talk tough" you should at least put some thought into how such a posture could affect not only yourself but your allies as well. I have been writing a game log that I plan to put into game stories once this game is over. Only then will you have the right to judge my intentions as they were at any one time.


So, what you're saying is that I'm scary and you're frightened of me?

Lol.

I wasn't "talking tough", I'm just naturally rather curt. I also have an ego problem.

None of which changes the fact that it was you, or more accurately the Sofians, who built up the 100-strong fleet in an attempt at fait accompli, declared war and are now shooting down Maera colonies, or the fact that despite my grudge against the Sofians I had no intention of attacking either of you in the foreseeable future with or without the Maera consenting.

Raindancer: I was doing the same, but lost it when I had to delete my user account to eliminate a virus/spyware.


[Updated on: Mon, 30 March 2009 10:24]

Report message to a moderator

Re: NAP Breach Mon, 30 March 2009 10:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
magic9mushroom is currently offline magic9mushroom

 
Commander

Messages: 1154
Registered: May 2008
Raindancer wrote on Mon, 30 March 2009 23:44

Agreed, and I think that the other players (at least those that I have had dealings with so far) are playing with both a sense of fun and honor.



I often lose sight of the "fun" half, though I never lose sight of the "honor" half.


[Updated on: Mon, 30 March 2009 10:27]

Report message to a moderator

Re: NAP Breach Mon, 30 March 2009 11:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Combat is currently offline Combat

 
Warrant Officer

Messages: 118
Registered: May 2008
I would not call it being afraid so much as I am not really keen on sitting around until someone is ready to take me out. A preemptive strike to take out a growing threat is in my mind a far more sound strategy for survival than defending myself from a fully prepared opponent with a well entrenched production base. Besides that the existence and current use of a fleet does not necessarily indicate its purpose of inception. In my mind the most important component of any strategy and/or tactic is flexability to forever changing conditions.


He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster...when you gaze long into the abyss the abyss also gazes into you.

Report message to a moderator

Re: NAP Breach Mon, 30 March 2009 12:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
magic9mushroom is currently offline magic9mushroom

 
Commander

Messages: 1154
Registered: May 2008
Combat wrote on Tue, 31 March 2009 01:41

I would not call it being afraid so much as I am not really keen on sitting around until someone is ready to take me out. A preemptive strike to take out a growing threat is in my mind a far more sound strategy for survival than defending myself from a fully prepared opponent with a well entrenched production base. Besides that the existence and current use of a fleet does not necessarily indicate its purpose of inception. In my mind the most important component of any strategy and/or tactic is flexability to forever changing conditions.


Indeed you are mostly correct.

You have just agreed with me that you are the aggressor here.

Report message to a moderator

Re: NAP Breach Mon, 30 March 2009 13:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Combat is currently offline Combat

 
Warrant Officer

Messages: 118
Registered: May 2008
I suppose that depends on your definition of aggressor. He who points his gun first or he who fires first.


He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster...when you gaze long into the abyss the abyss also gazes into you.

Report message to a moderator

Re: NAP Breach Mon, 30 March 2009 14:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
magic9mushroom is currently offline magic9mushroom

 
Commander

Messages: 1154
Registered: May 2008
Combat wrote on Tue, 31 March 2009 03:08

I suppose that depends on your definition of aggressor. He who points his gun first or he who fires first.


Both indict you, as while obviously for me to win you would have to be neutralised at some point, the same can be said of your relations with the Sofians, and I don't see you preemptively attacking them. And there was exactly zero indication of me having any designs on you. Your preemptive strike can be compared to that of the Starways Congress in Xenocide.

Like I said though, I have no problem with being at war with you, especially not in such favourable circumstances as I now enjoy.

Report message to a moderator

Re: NAP Breach Mon, 30 March 2009 14:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Combat is currently offline Combat

 
Warrant Officer

Messages: 118
Registered: May 2008
magic9mushroom wrote on Mon, 30 March 2009 14:24

Combat wrote on Tue, 31 March 2009 03:08

I suppose that depends on your definition of aggressor. He who points his gun first or he who fires first.


Both indict you, as while obviously for me to win you would have to be neutralised at some point, the same can be said of your relations with the Sofians, and I don't see you preemptively attacking them. And there was exactly zero indication of me having any designs on you. Your preemptive strike can be compared to that of the Starways Congress in Xenocide.

Like I said though, I have no problem with being at war with you, especially not in such favourable circumstances as I now enjoy.

Cool



He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster...when you gaze long into the abyss the abyss also gazes into you.

Report message to a moderator

Re: NAP Breach Thu, 02 April 2009 15:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
zilly is currently offline zilly

 
Crewman 3rd Class

Messages: 6
Registered: January 2009
Can't we all just get along?

Nope.



www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CirgVj8Baw

Report message to a moderator

Re: Mycelium/Ellurid Feud Fri, 03 April 2009 01:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
neilhoward

 
Commander

Messages: 1111
Registered: April 2008
Location: SW3 & 10023
Hahahahaha
You kids really want a three player alliance.
Now it is a race to see who can get their ally killed off first.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Mycelium/Ellurid Feud Fri, 03 April 2009 02:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
zilly is currently offline zilly

 
Crewman 3rd Class

Messages: 6
Registered: January 2009
Kids, eh? Let me show you some of my toys...


www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CirgVj8Baw

Report message to a moderator

Re: Mycelium/Ellurid Feud Fri, 03 April 2009 10:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
magic9mushroom is currently offline magic9mushroom

 
Commander

Messages: 1154
Registered: May 2008
Heh heh...

Report message to a moderator

Re: Mycelium/Ellurid Feud Fri, 03 April 2009 11:28 Go to previous message
Combat is currently offline Combat

 
Warrant Officer

Messages: 118
Registered: May 2008
Cool


He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster...when you gaze long into the abyss the abyss also gazes into you.

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: NAP Breach
Next Topic: The Bug Report 2442
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat May 26 23:11:26 EDT 2018