|
| Addendum 2482 |
Sun, 03 June 2007 12:30   |
|
|
|
Addendum 2482
# Mars tries to hit Minibari HW Wendy with 3 mineral packets at warp 10... all scheduled to arrive in 2483. At least 1 packet was stopped by Minibari freighters.
Wendy population
2482: 612k, 81% def
2483: 554k, 75% def
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| 2484 |
Mon, 04 June 2007 10:28 |
|
|
|
2484
* Gaim attack Smorgas (former Drakh HW) with 50 CCs and, while retreating, shoot down 4 Earth BBs but loose 15 xports.
* Gaim abandoned planet Heatwave
* Hyak attack Pak Sherman with 17 BBs and many OAs
* Hyak Ultra at Hoe equipped with 2 mass driver 7
* Hyak abandoned planet Elder
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| 2485 - 2486 |
Thu, 14 June 2007 10:56 |
|
|
|
2485
* Battle over Ipsha planet Steeple: Spoo Centre Fleet gets beaten and utterly destroyed
* Hyak attack Pak planet Yuppie Puppy with 12 BB and lots of OAs
* Battle over Smorgas: Gaim/Llort achieve a great victory
* Another battle over Silver, let's rename Silver to Verdun
2486
* Pak Spittle attacked by Ipsha but without bombers (still on the way)
* Pak Sherman gets bombarded by HYak
* Narn HW Putty attacked by Hyak but without bombers (still on the way)
* Spoo Abrams under attack of 14 Hyak BBs while bombers are still 2 years away
* Llort Silver finally lost to Earth
* Llort Catnip attacked and conquered Ipsha
* Magellan without defending VA-forces
* Gaim destroy 5 Ipsha BBs
[Updated on: Thu, 14 June 2007 11:03] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 2487 |
Tue, 19 June 2007 21:46 |
|
|
|
Production of IS-10 powered Zaidzev ships begins this year. Hopefully I will get W15 ty so that I can get Vladimir production under way too.
Unfortunately, all my shipyards are some distance from the Hal/Ship Shape front.
Also, I will probably be able to field only about half the numbers that Pak can since I have less resource & the ships are more expensive.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| 2488 |
Thu, 21 June 2007 10:14 |
|
|
|
Damn, those Hyak BBs are lucky bastards. Surprise attack vs Kosciusko with warp 9 thru about 70-ly of minefields. Devasting result...
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
| 2489 |
Mon, 25 June 2007 09:07 |
|
|
|
2489: more great news
* Finally Hyaks managed to conquere Narn HW Putty and Sodium.
* Spoo minefields in centre and east are eroding quickly since Hyaks extravagantly hunts my small minelayers with BBs
Actually this is rather good for the Spoo. The Hyaks are too slow and inefficient this way. Attacking planets with no less than 138 mini-bombers isn't the most efficient thing, either, while other combat fleets of BBs lack bombers to do any real damage.
Nevertheless the Spoo will loose several planets in the centre, some in the east and the worst: won't be able to support the Pak'ma'ra in time. As usual the rather vast distances within the Spoo territory lead to approx 5 years of needed time to assemble a combat fleet... which means around 2493.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| 2490 |
Thu, 28 June 2007 09:58 |
|
|
|
2490: desasters and victory
* Pak'ma'ra achieved a major victory at Inside-Out: shooting down no less than 29 Hyak BBs and 21 OAs!!!
* Spoo planet Abrams lost: it was a neat trap aimed to shoot down the attacking bombers but unfortunately the Drakh missed their turn and thus everything turned against the Spoo instead of the enemy. While Abrams is still heavily populated and defended, the planet is nevertheless lost due the the Hyak OAs which have brought down Abrams to -4% with the usual consequences for the efficiency of defenses and ressources. There was only one try to shoot down the enemy bombers.
* Vanguard Hyak fleet of 12 BBs attacked Spoo Kosciusko and lost 5 ships
* Spoo planet Kan under siege by 25 Hyak BBs: once again minefields weren't able to stop the Hyak ships who probably have made a pact with the devil in exchange for invulnerability against mines.
* Ipsha attack poor small Minibari at Knob
* Shadows attack Pak'ma'ra in orbit of Spoo Pantagruel or was it the other way around?
* no fight about shadow weap-16-lamb initiated (again)
[Updated on: Thu, 28 June 2007 10:02] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 2490 - weap16 |
Thu, 28 June 2007 12:43 |
|
|
|
| Micha wrote on Thu, 28 June 2007 18:05 |
| Altruist wrote on Thu, 28 June 2007 15:58 |
* no fight about shadow weap-16-lamb initiated (again)
|
Where should that have happened and what is not going like it should be?
mch
|
Where: Quark, Continental, Scotch and Elephant Ear
Might be several things: lambs not showing up or without attack order.
I've already some Red Pirates in transit to replace my scouts there but they'll need another year to arrive.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 2490 - weap16 |
Fri, 29 June 2007 07:26 |
|
|
|
| Quote: |
Hm, IF lambs showed up, you should have gotten a message like: "battle in orbit but your forces were not involved"? Or is that only when you own the planet ...
|
I recall having seen such messages for the Drakh or Llort several years ago. Spoo were involved via battle, probably due to the Centauri.
But since several years: nothing. Drakh, Llort, correct me if you still get the message about battles you weren't involved in.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: 2490 - weap16 |
Fri, 29 June 2007 19:15 |
|
|
|
| Altruist wrote on Fri, 29 June 2007 07:26 |
| Quote: |
Hm, IF lambs showed up, you should have gotten a message like: "battle in orbit but your forces were not involved"? Or is that only when you own the planet ...
|
I recall having seen such messages for the Drakh or Llort several years ago. Spoo were involved via battle, probably due to the Centauri.
But since several years: nothing. Drakh, Llort, correct me if you still get the message about battles you weren't involved in.
|
I was getting those messages but they have now stopped. Drakh have some RPs set to default BO & others at Armed/Any/Ratio/Shadows - the latter appear to still work. eg. if you check Drakh's turn you will find that a battle occured at Delta Delta Delta which included both W16 & C12 lambs.
Can anyone tell me what determines the order of battles? Maybe it's possible to participate in Shadows + others if Shadow W-L battles occur first (I recall that that did happen on at least 2 occasions in the past - maybe because those sites are at planets whereas the other sites are in space).
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 2492 |
Sat, 14 July 2007 19:20 |
|
|
|
The planets Hal & Hollywood are safe this year since there are no VA torp ships or chaff & insufficient firepower to defeat the right bases.
602Kt B-52s are pouring thru the WH south of Evergreen, 15 this year. I would really like to know the design. There are 8 more of them just west of Mayberry headed north - anyone in a postion to ping them?
Looks like a warp 10 attack by the Pak "stuck" fleet against the Hyak would've worked. I expecting them to move out of range completely since they knew your ships are warp 10.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2493 |
Mon, 16 July 2007 09:26 |
|
|
|
Damn, everything worked out as planned at Humus except a small mistake with the chaff-battleorders and everything... in vain. Grrr, could had gotten all the Hyak-bombers.
Not sure why the Narn DDs shot down the Minibari at the Llort-W/L-sites. Were they newly transfered to the Narn? They still had default battleorders (which still doesn't explain it)? Changed battle orders. Narn have excess RPs in the area, so 4 RPs will be transfered to the Minibari at the Llort W/L-sites.
[Updated on: Mon, 16 July 2007 09:46] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| 2497 |
Thu, 02 August 2007 18:53 |
|
|
|
2497
* unfortunately the SPOOmun Complat lost its Centre Fleet at Kitchener: 48 BBs gone
* Hyak, confirmed tech, minimum weap 22 and con 16. Doesn't seem to have en14 yet.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
He started using them some turns ago ... (so far for the good news 
)
