Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Primary Racial Traits » AR » Best Race Setting & Strategy For ARs.
Best Race Setting & Strategy For ARs. Tue, 28 January 2003 18:29 Go to next message
PassyCet is currently offline PassyCet

 
Crewman 2nd Class

Messages: 10
Registered: January 2003
Hi,

I need help on playing as ARs. Confused

I tried playing ARs using Growth Rate (5% to 18%)
and I can't seems to be able to meet the 25K2450 mark.
(I have yet to play Multi-players game). Sad

Is that such things as Monster ARs? Shocked

Presently, I'm sticking to the following settings.

AR
IFE, ARM, ISB, MA.
Tri-Immune, 5% growth rate.
Coefficient : 8
Energy, Weapon, Construction & Electronic : 50% less cost
Proplusion : Normal cost
Biology : 75% more cost

With the above setting I manage to play against 16 AIs (Experts) fairly well. But I have a feeling that it is not good against Players in MP Games. Confused

Help? Shocked

Report message to a moderator

Re: Best Race Setting & Strategy For ARs. Tue, 28 January 2003 18:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Micha

 

Messages: 2342
Registered: November 2002
Location: Belgium GMT +1
No AR has much of a chance in a MP game, unless there is a lot of space between him and the other players (a huge universe with 2 players for example Wink) or when he is a good diplomat and can convince the other players to _let_ him live ...

If this happens an AR _can_ (and most likely _will_) turn into a monster (unless you really screwed up race design). An AR has a tremendous research capacity since it doesn't need to build any planetary installations. AR can pump a lot of resources into nub research, or spend those resources in miners and get their mineral fountain running, no stopping them when that happens! Twisted Evil
Also don't bother with 25k and other resource based benchmarks, or like some say double the ARs resources and you have what a planetary race would have.

An example of an AR that won a game Grin No credit to me for the design, just another variation on William Butlers Ducknoids (do a google search in the Stars! newsgroup for articles about that race, very good race design).
LRTs: IFE, NRSE, ARM, ISB, NAS, LSP (yes a lot)
Habitat: grav immune, temp -60/124, rad 16/48, gives 1 in 6, growth is 15% (AR work VERY well with low growth, keep in mind that Death Stars can hold upto 3 million pop! That's about 120.000 pop growth for a 100% green at 33% pop hold)
Coeff at 10
Tech: eny/con/weap are cheap, rest is expensive, no start at 3, that would make the first eny research more expensive and you don't want that.

Also follow more or less this research plan (don't know who came up with it, found it somewhere on the web years ago).

1.energy to 4 at least.
(1a. Propulsion 2 if you have IFE)
2.con to 3 in order to move.
3.energy to 5-7 or so.
4.con 4 for spacedock hulls and privateers.
5.weapons 5 for initial terraforming.
6.energy exclusively to level 10.
7.con to 12 for ultrastations.
8.weapons 10 for terraforming (and defense)
9.energy to 16
10.con to deathstars.
11.then weapons to 16.
12.After that research things you need Smile

regards,
mch

[Edit: hm, maybe this thread is be
...



[Updated on: Tue, 28 January 2003 19:02]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Best Race Setting & Strategy For ARs. Tue, 28 January 2003 19:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
The Taubat is currently offline The Taubat

 
Officer Cadet 3rd Year

Messages: 263
Registered: December 2002
NAS? sorry cant agree with that LRT unless its on a PP or a JOAT, I tried building death stars with NAS and no PS came up Sad luckily that was a test and not a MP game Smile


Royal Sha'a'kar of the Taubat people

Report message to a moderator

Re: Best Race Setting & Strategy For ARs. Tue, 28 January 2003 19:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Micha

 

Messages: 2342
Registered: November 2002
Location: Belgium GMT +1
The Taubat wrote on Tue, 28 January 2003 19:11

NAS? sorry cant agree with that LRT unless its on a PP or a JOAT, I tried building death stars with NAS and no PS came up Sad luckily that was a test and not a MP game Smile


Oh, don't get me wrong, I was not recommending NAS for AR (like the topic might make you believe), I was merely posting an AR I used in a MP before.

But to discuss that LRT:
As an AR it is even more important to see what is coming your way so you can evacuate your starbases.
Penscans are good for this to see planet hoppers, OTOH NAS is _also_ good since you'll have a higher chance on spotting cloacked fleets when deepspace ... so what is "best"?

Personnaly I wouldn't trust my penscans anyway, there can always be a cloacked fleet in orbit (requires even less cloacking than deepspace!) so I will try to have cheap ships on every planet to look out for such a fleet. So I figured taht if I'm doing that I might as well drop penscans entirely Grin
You do lose the free penscans that come with ultras and Death Stars but you have better protection against cloacked fleets ...

regards,
mch


[Updated on: Tue, 28 January 2003 19:20]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Best Race Setting & Strategy For ARs. Wed, 29 January 2003 02:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
freakyboy is currently offline freakyboy

 
Lieutenant

Messages: 583
Registered: November 2002
Location: Where the clowns can't re...

My personal best performing AR race (17k by 2450.. 100 jihad cruisers by 2450)...

AR
IFE - the fuel mizer is essential for opening travel
NRSE - gives much needed points.
TT - increases ramp up speed and allows for better overal colonisation in the end game
ISB - err.... Duh.
NAS - frees up points... harsh on the race but I can afford to give up pen scans... I can't afford to give up anything else.

Grav immune
-4 to 132c
49mr to 83mr
15% growth

1 in 8 overal

Efficient... 10

Energy, construction, weapons cheap
elec prop bio expensive.

tech research pattern...
energy 3
propulsion 2
construction 3
energy 7
elec 2 - miners will be required... especially for the jihad cruisers
construction 8
energy 10
construction 9
propulsion 6 At this point jihad cruiser can be made.

At this point you can pump into more energy for more resources, construction to get to the Ultra station or you can (as I do) research bio to 4 and electronics to 6 since bio 4 gets you mine layers and electronics 6 is the best miner you can build.

Miner design... miner hull+cheap light engine+ only ONE miner robot... hey presto!! a gateable miner craft (with the 300/500 gate which you should get by 2460 at the latest).

Report message to a moderator

Re: Best Race Setting & Strategy For ARs. Wed, 29 January 2003 09:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PassyCet is currently offline PassyCet

 
Crewman 2nd Class

Messages: 10
Registered: January 2003
Hi again,

I was wondering about the research progress.

Will the following works? Shocked

Enery to 8 or 12
Propulsion 2,
Construction 4 (for Space Dock, & Destroyer)
Propulsioin 6, (for rad RAM)
Weapon 12 (for Jihad).
Construction 7 or 12 (either for Miner or Maxi-miner)
Electronics 4 or 6 (Robo-Maxi or Super Roba-Maxi).

at this stage : should have a "Mini-Mineral Fountain". Smile

Construction 13 (Battle ship)
Weapon 20 (Doomsday Missiles)
Construction 17 (Deathstars)or Weapon 24 (Armegeddon).

I'm trying to progress to "Advance & Expert" level game using AR.
(But I can't do it untill I can confirm to have a "Monster AR" or "Good Designed AR" to match the level of the games.
Very Happy

Report message to a moderator

Re: Best Race Setting & Strategy For ARs. Wed, 29 January 2003 14:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
freakyboy is currently offline freakyboy

 
Lieutenant

Messages: 583
Registered: November 2002
Location: Where the clowns can't re...

if you go to tech 8 in energy maybe... depends on your growth rate... you'll need to start exporting population as soon as possible really.

Also I'd look at getting some good miners BEFORE you get those jihads.

I tried jihads first and found ironium ran out before I could get enough mining ships to mine more minerals that I could spend by building another miner.

Better to be in a situation where you can't use up your ironium quick enough than have no ironium to build miners to mine ironium.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Best Race Setting & Strategy For ARs. Wed, 29 January 2003 19:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jeffimix is currently offline jeffimix

 
Officer Cadet 1st Year

Messages: 218
Registered: November 2002
Location: EGR, MI, USA

Yes AR are monsterable (>25K@2450) but onyl silly races can achieve that in excellent circumstances. Search for the Arvids and the ducknoids if you like AR, the most sucessful usually are Uni-Immune or Bi-Immune. ARvids use two narrow while the Ducknoids are Uni-immune two wide, so as to get more planets but they have 15% growth(Arvid the only AR race I believe have been monsterified are 1 immune two very narrow like 1 in 21 and have 19% growth and good hab and some nice LRTs) AR are hard to pull off, I'm playing one in a duel, bad bad bad mistake.


Email me as ----jeffimix@----yahoo.com----
(remove dashes)
The spamatron! run!!!

Report message to a moderator

Re: Best Race Setting & Strategy For ARs. Thu, 30 January 2003 23:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
zoid is currently offline zoid

 
Ensign

Messages: 348
Registered: December 2002
Location: Murray, KY - USA
Heck, I can't even beat the AI with an AR race. When I play AR, the word "suck" takes on a whole new meaning! Laughing

I'm playing in a game right now where 4 out of 7 players are AR, and it's scary for me, because I have no idea what they can accomplish. I have no frame of reference, because any AR race that I play are a bunch of limbless retards who can't think, can't build, can't mine, and can't see. All I know is that the AR players I'm up against arn't that lame; obviously they know stuff that I don't. Math, probably. Anyways, I've given up on using the force - my miners use shovels from now on, and live planetside like the good lord intended. Planetary scanners, yeah baby!

And while we're talking about AR, how come they don't die by the handfuls every time their starbase takes a volley of fire? Creepy little boogers die just trying to travel, so I'd think the impact of weapons on their starbase hull would be hell for them whether the base was destroyed or not.



I'M NOT AN EXPERT AND I'M OFTEN PROVEN WRONG. TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN YOU READ MY POSTS.
Math? Confused Ummm, sure! Nod I do FREESTYLE math.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Best Race Setting & Strategy For ARs. Fri, 31 January 2003 02:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
freakyboy is currently offline freakyboy

 
Lieutenant

Messages: 583
Registered: November 2002
Location: Where the clowns can't re...

Zoid shush!!!!

AR are already the weakest defensive PRT... please don't make it any harder!!!!

I mean it's easy enough to destroy a starbase, never mind just damage the thing!

Report message to a moderator

Re: Best Race Setting & Strategy For ARs. Sat, 01 February 2003 02:17 Go to previous message
zoid is currently offline zoid

 
Ensign

Messages: 348
Registered: December 2002
Location: Murray, KY - USA
ROFL


I'M NOT AN EXPERT AND I'M OFTEN PROVEN WRONG. TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN YOU READ MY POSTS.
Math? Confused Ummm, sure! Nod I do FREESTYLE math.

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: AR and zero to no LRTs
Next Topic: AR How Do You Build Up Your Defenses?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Apr 25 06:44:16 EDT 2024