|
|
|
|
| Re: Immunity vs maxed hab range bar |
Tue, 15 November 2011 11:48   |
|
|
|
Hi Core,
the Strogest Race in Stars is a CA with TT. There are a lot of
different CA settings but it is long time ago because the Race is so strong it is most time forbitten in Multiplayer games.
For the Topic:
A CA player mostly get better us if he dont us a immunity the Points you spend are mche more usfull in other parths gorw Tech faktories if any.
The main advantage of the TT CA is that you have only to research Bio to get a Hab ubgreat everywhere. Bio 9 is reached real fast and gives you a massive boost to your habs ( +10Terraforming everywhere ). you must have 3 techs at Level 10 for the same Effekt.
To make us of this a high pop grow would help.
So far
ccmaster
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Immunity vs maxed hab range bar |
Tue, 15 November 2011 23:27 |
|
 Braindead |
 | Officer Cadet 2nd Year |
Messages: 237
Registered: April 2005
Location: Ohio | |
|
| Core34 wrote on Tue, 15 November 2011 07:28 |
Hi.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts with me.
|
You're welcome.
| Quote: |
The fact, that this means most habitable planets to be much better may lead to a faster growth and so a quicker start, though.
|
Remember, immunity costs a lot. And I mean A LOT. There is a good reason for it. If you are not CA, it really makes a difference. However, for a CA that difference is very small. It's all about trade-offs. In this particular case, your gain for a CA with immunity compared to a CA without immunity (especially with TT) is very small. The benefit you get from taking the points and using them someplace else is much bigger. You can get better economy, cheaper factories/mines, higher growth rate, better tech, etc.
| Quote: |
I have to check this with the hab tool.
|
You might want to testbed this. Also, remember that no tool will tell you how playable your race is.
| Quote: |
The next question that rises in my mind is, if TT really pays off for a CA.  In the end it takes a long time until TT brings more terraforming than without
|
It gives you a nice boost at the start. You start with +/- 7%. And +/- 10% is right there too.
| Quote: |
- and it comes with the need to research bio AND .
|
Everything comes at a price. In case of CA, the price is very low, which is why it is not allowed in most games.
- braindead
Mess with the best, die like the rest!Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Immunity vs maxed hab range bar |
Fri, 02 December 2011 03:13 |
|
| magic9mushroom |
 | Commander |
Messages: 1361
Registered: May 2008 | |
|
The answer to the OP's question is "neither". With a TT CA, you shouldn't have any habs wider than 58 (for maxing out at TT 20) and you can go quite a bit lower.
As for the utility of TT for CA, TT is basically free for CA. Assuming you have reasonably sized habs and no immunity, the points you get for shrinking them by 4 clicks (as you start with TT7 instead of +-3) already pay for TT. So the only reason not to take TT is if it's banned (which, admittedly, is pretty damned likely).
[Updated on: Fri, 02 December 2011 03:13] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
Immunity vs maxed hab range bar
). Now I wondered if maybe the advantage points are better invested in other improvements than in going for immunity. Instead a maxed grav bar would mean as many habitable planets. The habitable planets - or most of them - would be much smaller but on the other hand the TT LRT wouldn't be wasted on gravity. The recovered points could for example be used to make the bars for temperatur and radiation wider.
