| tech trading requests |
Fri, 30 May 2003 17:45  |
|
|
|
Can I get Con 4 asap please? Once I have this I can start colonizing, and I'll set up a Weapons wolf/lamb. How's this sound?
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: tech trading requests |
Fri, 30 May 2003 21:24  |
|
|
|
I also really want Con 4 ASAP, so I can start colonising aggressively. And then Con 8. I have 18% pop but planets are basically too slow to ramp up unless they start with 100k pop for me.
Alex of the Naphtas
they made me do itReport message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: tech trading requests |
Sun, 01 June 2003 15:24 |
|
|
|
Okay -- so Con 4 will be lambed at 2409, this coming turn, correct? I'm setting my research to get con 3 this year, so if I get con 4 the same year I'll be set, and can both get more factories online and set up a wolf/lamb for weaps.
[Updated on: Sun, 01 June 2003 15:25] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: tech trading requests |
Sun, 01 June 2003 20:18 |
|
|
|
So who is doing con w/l? You can't send privateers to a wolf lamb, they are too expensive. We need somebody with cheap con to get to con 6, then we can do armed frigates in the w/l. I don't know when this can be done. The protons have expensive con research. I too would love privateer, but with germ rich HWs, medium freighters are working pretty well for me. Don't let lack of con 4 allow your planets to overcrowd. Use medium frieghters with a fuel pod. Those scouts we built for the Joat also make very good boosters to add range to you medium freighters.
Paladin
"There is no substitute for Integrity"Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: tech trading requests |
Tue, 03 June 2003 12:06 |
|
|
|
When the shadalarks get a gate built on Arafat, you can send the prop 5 lambs to them to be used as wolfs at his wolf lamb site. Be sure to change their orders back to default so they do not attack the SB. Maybe arafat is too close to the front for a w/l (give the other team ideas). Should we just have the const lambs gates to little brother? If we gate to little brother, we will need a couple of spares built in case we lose a couple do to over gating.
Either way, hold onto the prop 5 lambs to use as wolves. We will need more firepower to kill the more heavily armoured frigates.
Thoughts?
"There is no substitute for Integrity"Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: tech trading requests |
Tue, 03 June 2003 19:31 |
|
|
|
Yeah - IT takes less damage and doesn't lose ships to the Void, this is regardless of what gate is being used.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: tech trading requests |
Wed, 04 June 2003 08:33 |
|
|
|
It is true that ITs lose no ships to the void and we could avoid losses by transfering them to the IT. That being said, I would rather lose a lamb or two, than delay getting the tech an extra turn. If we wait a turn to transfer the lambs to the Protons so they will be safe to tranfer, we will lose a turn.
Paladin
"There is no substitute for Integrity"Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: tech trading requests |
Sat, 07 June 2003 10:06 |
|
|
|
GR any time is bad IMHO against humans.
"There is no substitute for Integrity"Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: tech trading requests |
Sat, 07 June 2003 21:41 |
|
|
|
Hi,
About the only thing I would like now is SFXs to expand even faster, and 100/250 SGs and FFs are on the way there so besides that, I don't really want anything quickly.
Oh, can the CA on the team make some DNA scanner lambs? And also maybe some organic armour FF lambs then as well?
Alex
they made me do itReport message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: tech trading requests |
Sun, 08 June 2003 09:43 |
|
|
|
I intend to make some lambs when I get gates. I am too close to the enemy to set up a w/l site (I don't want them getting ideas yet). I will build the lambs as soon as I get gates then I ship them up to the w/l site.
"There is no substitute for Integrity"Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: tech trading requests |
Sun, 15 June 2003 11:45 |
|
|
|
Thanks for Con 5, I've built a stargate at my HW at Lekgolo.
they made me do itReport message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: tech trading requests |
Sun, 15 June 2003 17:50 |
|
|
|
I just made const 4, and thanks for the lambs. Const 5 is key since I will be able to start building OAs and gate them to you(as long as you folks build some warships for me when I need them).
Paladin
"There is no substitute for Integrity"Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: tech trading requests |
Mon, 16 June 2003 02:06 |
|
|
|
Once the Protons hand out weapons 6, I'll pick up weapons from there. Sound good? I'm one resource away from weaps 2 right now.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: tech trading requests |
Mon, 16 June 2003 07:19 |
|
|
|
| Coyote wrote on Mon, 16 June 2003 02:06 |
Once the Protons hand out weapons 6, I'll pick up weapons from there. Sound good? I'm one resource away from weaps 2 right now.
|
Like you, the Protons have only weapons cheap. As IT, they will soon have access to green planets throughout all of our space so their economy should grow very quickly. Since weapons is our most important tech, the Protons should do it so we don't fall behind in the weapons race.
Since your economy is small, all your reources should be devoted to getting your economy going so you can build cloaked ships for the team.
Paladin
"There is no substitute for Integrity"Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: tech trading requests |
Tue, 17 June 2003 00:34 |
|
 Ozone |
 | Warrant Officer |
Messages: 115
Registered: April 2003
Location: Twilight Zone | |
|
Shadallark,
I am ready to start the Pop-Drop do you still want to use Sam?
Ozone
[Updated on: Tue, 17 June 2003 00:34] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
I accidentally posted the previous comment twice, so I'll just change this one into an incoherent rant. Graaaggghh!!! 
Imperialist dogs must perish!! *bangs shoe on table*
